Evidence Based Rehab

By: Christopher Robl from Rockhurst University

More information on Evidence in Motion found here.

More information on Physical Therapy found here.

Labels: EIM, elevator pitch, marketing, physical therapy

A pair of article from the April 1st issue of Spine remind us of what real reform in health care we need. While President Obama is at least attempting to get the ball rolling with changes in health care, Electronic Medical Records (EMR), expanded coverage, and "investing" in prevention and wellness aren't going to change today's problems at the root of rocketing health care costs.

One piece at the root of these rocketing costs is excessive use of imaging, surgery, and drugs. Low back pain treatment often gets the full brunt of these high cost, low efficacy procedures. Now, the new issue of Spine shines some light on the harm this approach can cause.

In the first article by Timothy Carey, MD - Practice patterns and evidence in chronic low back pain care - it was found that (surprise) there is an overuse of narcotics and imaging and little use of established beneficial treatment of exercise. The figures quoted in the article report fewer than 30% of LBP suffers had seen a physical therapist in the past year and, worse yet, only 3% had gone through a structured rehabilitation program.

The second article by Sham Maghout Juratli, MD - Mortality After Lumbar Fusion Surgery - there was a finding of alarmingly high percentage of deaths after fusion surgery related to Analgesic overdose. The author comments that:

Analgesic-related deaths are responsible for more deaths and more potential life lost among workers who underwent lumbar fusion than any other cause.

So, instead of treating LBP primarly with research-proven exercise prescription there is an overuse of narcotics and surgery that are leading to increased loss of life!

Maybe rewarding those attempting to use what research shows as effective for LBP instead of shelling out billions for imaging, drugs, and surgery might not only lead to lessening costs but decreased mortality.

Labels: evidence based medicine, Fusions, Low back pain, physical therapy

Announced today is the formation of the first wiki-based collaborative online educational resource for the global physiotherapy community. Physiopedia is an ambitious project which aims to eventually offer an evidence-based knowledge resource for physiotherapy professionals throughout the world. Through utilising collaborative wiki technology Physiopedia is a place where all physiotherapists can participate by contributing, sharing and building knowledge to develop a global understanding. For educators Physiopedia offers an opportunity to involve their students in this knowledge creation process as part of an educational program.

Individuals and educational institutions around the world are contributing to Physiopedia in various ways. Educational institutions are engaging their students to contribute content as part of their educational program, expert clinicians are contributing seed content free of copyright restrictions and individuals are contributing content out of their own personal interest and as part of their professional development.

Making high quality information for physiotherapy professionals freely available via a collaborative, open and constantly evolving website has the potential to promote the physiotherapy profession and improve patient care. Over the next few years, there will be a growing community of contributors who will create pages in different clinical areas covering anatomy, physiology, conditions, assessment and interventions. Other professional resources that will be created include evidence based practice, outcome measures and research methods. These pages will be constructed using the latest evidence and will be constantly evolving with updated information.

Today Physiopedia is calling for students, clinicians and educational institutions to contribute content. Professionals around the world who contribute to Physiopedia will have the opportunity to make a difference by promoting our profession and in improving the health of our patients. Physiopedia will also serve as an important place for professionals to create a presence on the Web and become known for their specialties.

Physiopedia’s founder is Rachael Lowe from the UK, a physiotherapist and e-learning specialist who combines these skills with the specific aim of utilising web technology for physiotherapy education. She has developed this site with the global community in mind in consultation with Eric Robertson, Assistant Professor at the Medical College of Georgia in the USA.

Educational institutions and clinicians have begun to contribute content to Physiopedia and the site will continually develop to provide a valuable promotional and educational resource to the global physiotherapy community. This free public site will officially launch later in 2009 but this preview site becomes available today at www.physio-pedia.com.

Labels: evidence based medicine, Open Access, physical therapy

Richard Deyo MD, the keynote speaker at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapists (AAOMPT) National Conference in October 2008, has again published data indicting the US approach to chronic back pain dramatically increases costs without improved outcomes. Deyo and colleagues reported in the January 2009 issue of the Journal of American Board of Family Practice the following staggering statistics:

• A 629% increase in Medicare expenditures for epidural steroid injections;
• A 423% increase in expenditures for opioids for back pain;
• A 307% increase in the number of lumbar magnetic resonance images among Medicare beneficiaries;
• A 220% increase in spinal fusion surgery rates.

The incidence of chronic and acute Low Back Pain, as documented by office visits, has not changed during the last 12 years. The application of these technologies is not without consequences Deyo et al noted, ‘Innovation has often outpaced clinical science, leaving uncertainty about the efficacy and safety of many common treatments. Complications and even deaths related to pain management are increasing.’ Indeed, the reoperation rates for low back pain have increased, not improved. The authors conclude that the ‘Prescribing yet more imaging, opioids, injections, and operations is not likely to improve outcomes for patients with chronic back pain.’ They note that these approaches often are applying an acute care model to chronic pain and not acknowledging the current evidence that chronic pain requires a different approach and that there are ‘no magic bullets.’ In a “chronic care model” chronic back pain, like diabetes or asthma, ‘is a condition we can treat but rarely cure.’ Deyo et al suggest the solution that ‘chronic back pain may benefit from sustained commitment from health care providers; involvement of patients as partners in their care; education in self-care strategies; coordination of care; and involvement of community resources to promote exercise, provide social support, and facilitate a return to work.’

Tim Flynn, PT, PhD, president of the AAOMPT states, ‘The manual physical therapist is the health care provider uniquely trained to manage individuals with chronic low back pain. We utilize low risk, state-of-the-art care incorporating exercise, manual physical therapy, patient education and the application of the biopsychosocial model in managing this chronic condition. The Academy is dedicated to the application of current models for chronic pain management.’ The recent AAOMPT conference in Seattle focused on current theories and practice of chronic pain management with international experts on pain management.

Labels: AAOMPT, CPR, Direct access, evidence based medicine, health care, LBP, Low back pain, physical therapist, physical therapy

Reading the newest issue of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy Practice (the magazine of the Orthopaedic Section of the APTA) I found interesting the Editor's Message written by Christopher Hughes, PT, PhD, OCS. The letter titled "When All Else Fails...We Succeed!" relates that an episode of care from a Physical Therapist that does not end with hoped for gaols met, is not a waste. That, in fact, it is a valuable tool to help in the clinical decision making by MD's - especially in the arena of deciding on surgery or other invasive procedure.

I agree with this view, and have educated a number of my clients that at the very least, their episode with me will make them better prepared for surgery and increase their prognosis after surgery. I would like to speak on a subject related to this: Over Utilization.

I will give our fellow professionals the benefit of the doubt and say that the desire to achieve all goals for all clients leads to continuing treatment past maximum medical benefit. We all do this, and looking at my stats from 2008, those who were discharged w/o all goals met averaged about 2-3 more visits than those who where discharged with goals met. Some of that is related to me trying to get that last goal or two, some related to MD referring back to "just try a little more", and more is related to the client wanting to have more PT. Now, what we need to be aware of is "benefit chasing".

We all know of clinics/PTs that do this. If the client has 20 visits per year, that's how many PT sessions they'll get. Regardless if it's a knee sprain or s/p ACL reconstruction. It's this practice behavior that really hurts us, particularly in the eyes of the insurance companies.

I'm sure there are many reasons why this practice occurs. Including desire to maximize profits. What we need to do as a profession is self police and encourage appropriate utilization of our care provided. Steps we (individually) can do are:

1. Set goals with time frames, and share these with our clients. This will help hold ourselves accountable.
2. Use outcome surveys. DASH, Oswestry, Neck Disability Inex, etc. Easy to get caught up in the "I feel a little better" trap and keep treating. Use these tools to help measure actual perceived change allowing you to make better continued treatment decisions.
3. Track your outcomes. This will allow you to evaluate your tendacies in treatment and areas you can improve.
4. Question your collegues and be open to constructive critisism from your collegues regarding visits.

How do you monitor utlization? Do have anecdotes regarding over use or proper use of PT sessions? Any other suggestions on how to prevent over utilization?

Labels: evidence based medicine, outcomes, over-use, physical therapy

The folks over at Evidence In Motion have announce the winners of their "30 Second Elevator Pitch Contest" asking participants to answer the question:

- Why physical therapy is the best first choice in musculoskeletal care.

The grand prize winner was the entry submitted by BJ Lehecka from Wichita State University. You can see BJ's winning entry below. To see the full list of winners and other information, please go to EIM's blog found here.

Labels: Direct access, media, physical therapy, public relations

Stumbled upon a nice article written about physical therapy from a patient's perspective. Nice view as it starts out with the patient expressing his hesitation in trying treatment from a PT and his desire for a quick fix.

Oh great!" I remember thinking. "Voodoo medicine! Why can't they just give me a pill to make this go away?

Nice to see a physical therapist was able to get one of our countries finest back up and running! You can read the rest of the article by clicking HERE.

Jason L. Harris

Labels: physical therapist, physical therapy, treatment

Seattle, Washington, October 30, 2008- Physical therapists from around the world are converging on Seattle this week for the annual conference of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapists (AAOMPT). Pain: From Science to Solutions, the conference theme, speaks to the unique role physical therapists have in combating pain. Pain from musculoskeletal problems such as back and neck pain is a leading cause of healthcare utilization. Manual physical therapy techniques such as spinal manipulation play an important role in pain relief for patients throughout the United States. Manual physical therapy includes the use of hands-on techniques including joint and soft-tissue mobilization designed to restore motion and reduce pain. AAOMPT members will be discussing emerging research suggesting that spinal manipulation has the ability to positively affect the brain’s processing of pain signals. Keynote speaker and distinguished researcher, Richard Deyo, MD, MPH, will open the conference. Dr. Deyo is the Kaiser-Permanente Endowed Professor in Evidence-Based Medicine, Oregon Health Science University Department of Family Medicine.

AAOMPT president, Tim Flynn, PT, PhD, said about the conference, “This is an exciting time for physical therapy and for health care. On one side, we have a tremendous amount of research emerging in support of manual physical therapy for pain relief, and on the other side we see the stars aligning for great change in the health care industry.” Flynn continued, “As a patient, your choices come down to drugs, surgery, or physical therapists. Physical therapists can offer a low-cost solution for patients with pain and high-quality research supports what we do.”

For more on the benefits physical therapists can provide in the management of back and neck problems, contact your nearest physical therapist or visit the American Academy of Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapists website at www.aaompt.org. AAOMPT represents physical therapists by promoting excellence in orthopaedic manual physical therapy practice, education and research.

---

Jason L. Harris

Labels: AAOMPT, evidence based medicine, manipulation, physical therapy

Seattle, Washington, October 29, 2008- Washington is one of only two states in the nation that prohibits physical therapists from performing spinal manipulation. Back and neck pain are two of the most common reasons patients seek medical care. The ability of physical therapists to perform spinal manipulation is supported by numerous high quality randomized clinical trials. This body of research, much of it developed by physical therapists, has demonstrated the proven efficacy of manual physical therapy interventions, to include mobilization AND manipulation, for patients with back and neck pain. Physical therapists have produced landmark research in the area of low back and neck pain which is recognized by national and international physician groups. This month’s issue of Spine, reports on the results of a randomized clinical trial, which demonstrated that patients with neck pain who received a physical therapy program of spinal manipulation and exercise had twice the improvement in symptoms compared to the current guideline group (Walker, 2008). Unfortunately, the current law prevents the citizens of the state of Washington from receiving physical therapy treatment that is evidence based, proven to be effective, and recommended in clinical practice guidelines.

Tim Flynn, PT, PhD, president of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapists, expressed confidence that, "Given the overwhelming evidence of the benefits of physical therapy I would expect that this limitation will soon change. It is time to bring health care in Washington into the 21st century.” Flynn continues, “The American Medical Association, the Department of Defense, the American Physical Therapy Association’s Scope of Practice, as well as 48 other states in our nation recognizes physical therapists’ ability to perform spinal manipulation. Furthermore, the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society (Chou, 2007) have published clinical practice guidelines recommending manipulation by physical therapists as the only proven treatment for patients suffering with acute low back pain.“

---

It is my opinion that the chiropractic associations continue to push and agenda portraying "patient safety" as a reason to continue to prevent PT's in the state of Washington to manipulate. However, manipulation is taught to all PT's in our training, just as examination, evaluation, therapeutic exercise, and physical modalities skills are taught. "Safety" is a red herring covering-up for the real reason which is profits. Legislators in Washington need to hear from patients in particular about how this law is negatively affecting their health care potentially leading to chronic conditions and significantly increased costs.

Jason L. Harris

Labels: AAOMPT, evidence based medicine, legislation, physical therapy

Osteoarthritis (OA) is no doubt a growing cause of loss of function in our society. MSNBC's Health department recently reported on this growing epidemic related to total joint replacements. They are worth a watch. The first video found here discusses the financial impact on Medicare and the second seems more of a marketing clip for total joint replacements. What caught my ear was in the second video the surgeons comments on why total joints. To paraphrase he states total joints are done when "conservative" treatments don't help. He lists conservative treatments as "medications and drugs..". Wow, is it any surprise that these failed? Not many of us can manage chronic progressive pain with medications.

What is disappointing is the utter lack of mention of what literature shows helps and what is a first line recommendation for pain and dysfunction related to OA. That is Physical Therapy. PT is less expensive, can lead to independence in pain management, has good long term outcomes, and has little to no potential negative effects. These qualities are almost completely opposite of what pills and injections offer.

I've seen total joint replacements completely change a persons function, but if we truly want to decrease costs of conservative management of joint pain, we need to shift away from expensive drugs and injections, eliminate unnecessary imaging, and encourage the return of individuals control over their physical well being.

So, you've got drugs, you've got surgery, or you've got Physical Therapy. Let's let individuals know about their choices.

Jason L. Harris

Labels: Direct access, Medicare, Osteoarthritis, physical therapy

Web-based academic discussions could well be the way forward for cost-effective and tailored continuing education for health professionals. China’s interactive Orthochina.org wiki project for orthopaedic surgeons is an example of the potential of such internet training for continuing medical education. Zhen-Sheng Ma of the Fourth Military Medical University in Xi’an, China, and his colleagues thoroughly evaluated this online tool and will publish their results¹ in the October issue of Springer’s journal Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

Until recently, the primary vehicle for continuing medical education has been the more traditional conferences and training courses. However, the content of these sorts of courses is not necessarily tailored to meet the individual or immediate needs of professionals and their cost-effectiveness has yet to be established. Created in 1998, Orthochina.org uses an interactive case-based format and is structured using the wiki concept, where the content of the website is created collaboratively by users through an Internet browser. Information in Chinese and English is posted, edited, deleted and updated by carefully screened participants and is academically monitored by its orthopaedic users. Ten years on, the site boasts nearly 34,000 users and counts over 6,000 visits and over 2,000 posts every month.

Real patient cases are submitted for discussion by orthopaedic surgeons. They include the patient’s complaint, findings from physical examinations and relevant images. Professional discussions between participants take place anywhere, anytime, giving suggestions for diagnosis and treatment. Multiple opinions can help the surgeon who has posted his complex case, and is seeking advice on how to treat it, to make an informed decision about his treatment plan.

The authors firmly believe that “surgeon-to-surgeon communication is the most important, the easiest, most closely related to clinical practice, and cost-effective method of patient-problem-orientated continuing medical education.” By using the Internet, orthopaedic surgeons from different backgrounds and geographic locations can work together to enhance their quality of care, something workshops and meetings cannot provide in such a tailored and timely manner.

As a profession that is hampered by practice variation and difficulty adapting (changing) to more evidence based treatemt, I feel physical therapy could really fourish with a similar approach. While we do have great sites to share ideas (EIM, Rehabedge, SomaSimple), often time the forum type format can be disonjointed and hard to follow or return to in the future.

Jason L. Harris

Labels: EBM, physical therapy, Wiki

The fine folks over at NursingDegree.net have worked to post a list of their thoughts on important websites and resources for Physical Therapists.   They have entitled it: "100 Essential Sites and Resources for Physical Therapists".  Check it out and leave a note on your thoughts on what was included and maybe what you think should be included that maybe wasn't.

Jason Harris

Labels: blogs, physical therapist, physical therapy

Wow, it has been a while and I apologize for that. My family and I have moved across the country, sold our house, started new jobs, and have been looking for a new home just in the last month. On top of that, I have been without internet access until just this past week. Well, I am back, and hope to again barage you all with disconnected rants and musings.

I'll take this time to try to give a peek as to what I plan to post on in the near future:

• Medicare Cap
• Round 2 of NATA vs APTA
• Because I'm forced to...the Wii in rehab
• Reviews on interesting Journal articles that others may like too

Expect a new post early next week. Thanks to those still subscribed.

Jason Harris

Labels: evidence based medicine, physical therapy, welcome

Degenerative Disc Disease. For many of those that get an unnecessary MRI and get this diagnosis, it's often taken as a death sentence for a back instead of what it is - a normal process related to aging. Although pain can be associated with DDD, it is more often just a radiologic finding. Something that was most likely present before onset of spinal pain and will remain unchanged once the spinal pain recedes.

June's issue of the Journal of Orthopedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) includes and excellent commentary on what we know and don't know regarding intervertebral disc degeneration. I would like to summarize some critical points I found in the article.

• Although environmental factors play a role in the incidence and progression of DDD, the strongest predictors are genetically related. It is estimated that 74% of what causes DDD appears related to genetics.
• Smoking and heavy labor have not been supported as etiologic factors in developing DDD. In fact, competitive weight lifters w/o trauma have a lower than expected rate of DDD.
• Primary factor in DDD is reduction of the Intervertebral Disc's (IVD) nutritional capacity.
• "...age-related changes that occur in the composition of the IVD are similar to those observed in articular cartilage and are not necessarily related to pain."
• Vertebral endplate disruptions are being shown to have a strong relationship with DDD.
• Although similar in appearance, there are measurable differences in the diffusion capacity at the vertebral endplate of those IVD's with age-related disc degeneration and symptomatic degnerative discs. This may suggest that aging and degeneration are 2 separate processes.
• "High-Intensity Zones" represented by high intensity T2 signals near the outer margins of the annulus are correlated to pain production with discography (IMO, discography is often painful regardless of pathology) but also commonly found in asymptomatic individuals. This leads to poor specificity and the authors suggest it should not be used in isolation to make clinical decisions.
• The body's attempt to heal annular tears may lead to increasing the area of the disc that is innervated which is further increased by inflammatory byproducts which can lower the threshold needed to trigger pain. The result could be increased sensitivity to otherwise innocuous stimuli. This includes those from just standing and/or walking.
• Even if MRI shows a dramatic disc bulge, this finding is very often not associated with symptoms.
• When nuclear material breaks free and migrates into the vertebral foramen, ipsilateral pain and parasthesia may occur. This results from the chemical response to the nuclear material touching the dorsal root ganglion and not from "pinching" the nerve.

The authors then make some comments on clinical relevance. Here are a few that will lead to a change in the way I treat on Monday:

• Patients with later stage DDD - decreased disc height and hydrostatic nucleus lost - care should be taken during loading progressions, avoiding sustained loading at end range trunk motions.
• Symptoms often occur several hours after trauma to the degenerated disc (DD). Thus, exercise in the gym may go well but in the morning the patient may be too painful to even get out of bed.
• Studies have found favorable outcome in treating DDD with lumbar stabilization exercises.
• It was found that patients with DD who avoided early morning lumbar flexion had significantly less pain and disability then did those who performed lumbar flexibility exercises early in the morning.
• Patients with DD should be encouraged to avoid prolonged flexed compressive forces such as sitting in flexed position.
• Hip ROM limitation can have large effects on loads acting on the lumbar spine.
• The authors make it a point to illustrate the important role the psychological effect that the diagnosis of "degenerative disc disease" has on the patient. they state:
• "...it is important that clinicians carefully communicate with patients to reassure them that DD is a normal aging process; while it certainly can be associated with episodes of pain, only in rare exceptions do these symptoms represent serious disease, and they should not, therefore, prevent one from performing reasonable activities."

It's important to remember the fact DD is related to normal aging. And, thus, it's main treatment should most likely be non-invasive conservative care. And, as I always say, PT's are the experts in this area and well positioned to give the more efficacious care.

Jason L. Harris

Labels: DDD, Degenerative Disc Disease, DRX 9000, evidence based medicine, Low back pain, physical therapy

More surgery, more drugs, and more injections are not what the doctor ordered.

Tallahassee, Florida, May 20, 2008 – When it comes to chronic back pain management patients should know that “less is more.” The American Pain Society at their annual meeting unveiled a current review on invasive procedures for the treatment of chronic low back. The scientific review concluded that most invasive interventions, including spinal joint injections, radiofrequency denervation, intradiscal electrothermal therapy demonstrated no evidence of effectiveness. Furthermore, surgical procedures for chronic low back pain demonstrated only small improvement in pain and disability but were accompanied by considerable risk.

"The expert panel reaffirms its previous recommendation that all low-back pain patients stay active and talk honestly with their physicians about self care and other interventions. "In general, non-invasive therapies supported by evidence showing benefits should be tried before considering interventional therapies or surgery," said Chou."

“The American Pain Society panel has acknowledged the central role of an active physical therapy program in managing low back pain patients,” noted Timothy W. Flynn PT, PhD, President of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapists. “The key in chronic low back pain is avoiding too much medicine. There is no magic bullet but a combination of hands on care and an active exercise approach is the best solution.”

Labels: AAOMPT, evidence based medicine, Healthcare, LBP, Low back pain, physical therapy, public relations

Labels: Direct access, evidence based medicine, Medicare, physical therapy

I thought I would share some resources on how to find a Physical Therapist in your area. The yellow pages is an Ok place to start. Asking a friend or you primary care provider whom they'd recommend is another option. For those that can't or don't want to use these options, there are a few tools on the internet that will help you:

• Find a Physical Therapist - A search engine provided by the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA). It lists physical therapists via a specific radius from a given zip code. You can also filter by specialty (orthopaedics, geriatrics, etc). Limited as only members of the APTA are listed - but...would you want a PT that doesn't participate in their professional organization anyways?
• Find a Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapist - The American Academy of Orthopaedic and Manual Physical Therapists (AAOMPT) provides a tool to find physical therapists that have advanced training, via a fellowship, in orthopeadic manual therapy. While all PT's use manual therapy in some form, these PT's have demonstrated advanced skill and knowledge with it's use.

Good luck with your search!

Jason L. Harris

Labels: Direct access, how to find, physical therapist, physical therapy, search

A subject that is, again, seeing some light in PT world is Physician Owned PT clinics or POPTS as they are often referred to (acronyms are cool). This subject is also being discussed over at Evidence In Motion and Rehabedge (a rehabilitation forum).

Why are these a problem or concern to those outside the PT profession? This is an excellent question, because this situation does affect the general public as well as my profession.

I'll forgoing making any claims of the ethical nature of a physician owned clinic or those PT's that work for them. Suffice to say, it IS bad policy. While the mantra of these setups is that it is an attempt to provide convenient care with better oversight, in the end it is more about improving the revenue stream than patient care. An MD wanting to make money is not a bad thing. But, POPTS do present specific problems:

1. Inherent conflict of interest. The MD stands to profit from referring a patient to the clinic THEY OWN.
2. Doing so restricts a patient's CHOICE in regards to PT consultation.
3. When a patient can be used as an additional revenue source, the trust between that patient and the doctor is seriously compromised.
   
4. POPTS directly impact the autonomy of an individually licensed, regulated, and recognized profession. Doing so can affect the quality of care a patient seeking consultation with a physical therapist receives.
   

Additionally, a well known study done by Jean M. Mitchell, PhD, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) found the folowing in regards to POPTS:

• “Visits per patient were 39% to 45% higher in joint venture facilities.
• “Both gross and net revenue per patient were 30% to 40% higher in facilities owned by referring physicians.
• “Percent operating income and percent markup were significantly higher in joint venture physical therapy and rehabilitation facilities.
• “Licensed physical therapists and licensed therapist assistants employed in non-joint venture facilities spend about 60% more time per visit treating physical therapy patients than licensed therapists and licensed therapist assistants working in joint venture facilities.
• “Joint ventures also generate more of their revenues from patients with well-paying insurance.”

For those being referred to a physical therapist, ask you MD if they have financial interest in where they are sending you (seems as though they should tell you upfront, doesn't it?). If you are not comfortable with this situation, request that they refer you to a more convienient or non-physician owned PT clinic. You can also go HERE to do a search for local physical therapists and how to contact them directly.

Jason L. Harris

Labels: AMA, APTA, Direct access, education, kickbacks, physical therapist, physical therapy, physicians, POPTS, referral-for-profit

The APTA recently released an article on the benefits of seeing a Physical Therapist (PT) for back pain. They point out that despite a recent article in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) that even with rising costs associated with back pain there has been no improvements in care, PT's have an excellent track record with the public, and more importantly, in the literature showing our effectiveness in treating back pain with out surgery or drugs.

Consumers need to know that physical therapist management is a low-cost, high-value alternative to drugs and surgery to deal with musculoskeletal pain," said APTA President R Scott Ward, PT, PhD. "The judicious use of appropriate physical therapist treatment based on best evidence can improve the function of people who struggle with back and neck conditions." Ward added, "Because patients with chronic, disabling low back pain account for a disproportionate share of health care expenditures and workers' compensation costs, the potential cost savings of an early, effective intervention to prevent individuals from progressing to chronic disability may be considerable.

Here is the link to the press release.

Labels: AMA, APTA, evidence based medicine, LBP, Low back pain, manipulation, outcomes, physical therapist, physical therapy

Drugs, Surgery, or Physical Therapists

A great post over at Evidence in motion on good news coverage on the benefits of physical therapy. I usually don't like to make post on other posts, but this seems to scream to be an exception. Please click the link above to read.

Here is the link to the video on back pain and physical therapy.

Labels: Direct access, evidence based medicine, LBP, Low back pain, physical therapy